Andrey (azangru) wrote,

Bret talks to Peter McCormack — a British journalist focusing mostly on Bitcoin — about his conversation with Pierre Kory and his convictions about ivermectin. The talk, which must be a recording of a Clubhouse room, has been posted on SoundCloud, which apparently is safer than Youtube these days :-)

What's incomprehensible to me is how, with all the noise that Bret is making and all the publicity that he is seeking, he has never been able to talk publicly to a doctor or a researcher capable of explaining the rationale behind the acting medical guidelines, be they from CDC or from WHO, or from whomever is making them. For example, Bret spends some time arguing that there is no point in vaccinating those who have recovered from covid. Which certainly makes sense to a person with very basic understanding of immunology; but presumably, people who issue the guidelines have a far superior knowledge than what can be reasoned from the first principles of an undergraduate textbook. The journalist doesn't have even those fundamentals, so he cannot challenge Bret, or even ask him why he thinks the current guidelines are as they are. So weird.

  • (no subject)

    On the dreadful state of the style of modern Russian communication. "There is no alternative", writes an author, and then immediately outlines an…

  • Via Twitter

    Via a tweet, but I thought I'd get my own copy. A beautiful illustration of how a caption totally misrepresents what's been captured in the photo.…

  • (no subject)

    Here's an extract from Uncle Bob's book Clean Agile. Although he has fallen out of grace with the champions of social justice, the sentiment…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.