Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

Bret Weinstein talks to one of the principal advocates of ivermectin. He is an interesting personality — so thanks to Bret for having this conversation — but god, it's so annoying when Bret interrupts him to "translate" the medical lingo for who he thinks his audience is. He is doing precisely what puts me off in so many web dev podcasts, when the hosts would invite a knowledgeable guest, strike up a conversation, and then interrupt him mid-sentence to explain "to those who are newer" the meaning of this or that word. Or ask the guest to do it. The guests usually take it stoically. Bret's guest does as well. But it's clearly apparent in the video below (about 16 minutes in) that after the doctor is distracted from recounting his early experience with covid, in which he is just about to explain why he started treating his patients with blood thinners and steroids, he loses his train of thought and doesn't pick it up after Bret's effusive commentary.

Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Two clips left a particularly deep impression on me over the last couple of days. One is Pelosi's reply to a journalist: Not the first of her…

  • (no subject)

    Is the CNN making the point for Bret Weinstein (transmitting the message of Geert Vanden Bossche)? So strange to see.

  • (no subject)

    The blame game that DiBlasio plays in this clip is disgusting. Instead of saying, we, your leaders, were wrong; we miscalculated; we thought that the…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments