Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

I am generally very skeptical of whorfianism (although, yes, I know, there are some suggestive experimental data about how grammar guides people's choices when they are asked to assign gender to genderless objects, etc.). However. I am amazed to see McWhorter argue against whorfianism largely on purely ethical grounds. I would have thought that it is completely irrelevant for the validity of a theory whether or not it happens to lead to moral or immoral conclusions:

Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Also, Google's documentation style guide. With the latest trends about the correct language, obvi. This one via HN.

  • (no subject)

    Google's document on how they build Chrome dev tools with web components. And yeah, it includes a special dance for some semblance of type safety,…

  • (no subject)

    On the ideology in the industry: A guest on a podcast: There was a thread on Twitter the other day, with Adam Rackis, and he had made a comment…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments