Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

This is probably no way to write gherkin. Gherkin was supposed to act as a bridge between business stakeholders who don't know how to read code, but know exactly what value they want to get from the code (i.e. what, ultimately, the code is supposed to do), and developers, who know how to code, but don't know why.

If Gherkin is used as a communication tool for the testers themselves, then what's the point of even adding this extra level of indirection.
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    On the dreadful state of the style of modern Russian communication. "There is no alternative", writes an author, and then immediately outlines an…

  • Via Twitter

    Via a tweet, but I thought I'd get my own copy. A beautiful illustration of how a caption totally misrepresents what's been captured in the photo.…

  • (no subject)

    Here's an extract from Uncle Bob's book Clean Agile. Although he has fallen out of grace with the champions of social justice, the sentiment…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments