Andrey (azangru) wrote,

This is probably no way to write gherkin. Gherkin was supposed to act as a bridge between business stakeholders who don't know how to read code, but know exactly what value they want to get from the code (i.e. what, ultimately, the code is supposed to do), and developers, who know how to code, but don't know why.

If Gherkin is used as a communication tool for the testers themselves, then what's the point of even adding this extra level of indirection.

  • (no subject)

    There's a strange tendency out there for tech podcasters not to be good programmers themselves. There are exceptions, of course. The googlers at…

  • (no subject)

    Achievement unlocked: today, for the first time, I wrote an asynchronous iterator. Using an async generator (also for the first time; I never felt a…

  • (no subject)

    This is a good summation:

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.