Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

Random thought (although I'm sure I've already wondered about this, perhaps aloud and in this very LJ): if bad writing obscures meaning and impairs communication, then how come a whole breed of scholars gained the notoriety that they've got? How did they get read and noticed? It may be that by now, the fact of having read their torturous texts has become a self-sustaining rite of passage and a badge of honour; but how did they acquire fame if their texts were so impenetrable to begin with? Take that, Pinker ;-)

Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    A Google docs presentation file from a recent event. With a script in the bottom — at least, I assume that this is script; I doubt it's a transcript…

  • (no subject)

    Twitter is an unending fount of amusement today. The creator and former maintainer of Babel is attacking the current maintainer of Babel for slacking…

  • (no subject)

    This is interesting: the quotes from the article, cited in the tweets, are complimentary to the skeptics; the conclusion puts them in the camp of…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments