Andrey (azangru) wrote,

Random thought (although I'm sure I've already wondered about this, perhaps aloud and in this very LJ): if bad writing obscures meaning and impairs communication, then how come a whole breed of scholars gained the notoriety that they've got? How did they get read and noticed? It may be that by now, the fact of having read their torturous texts has become a self-sustaining rite of passage and a badge of honour; but how did they acquire fame if their texts were so impenetrable to begin with? Take that, Pinker ;-)


  • (no subject)

    On the dreadful state of the style of modern Russian communication. "There is no alternative", writes an author, and then immediately outlines an…

  • Via Twitter

    Via a tweet, but I thought I'd get my own copy. A beautiful illustration of how a caption totally misrepresents what's been captured in the photo.…

  • (no subject)

    Here's an extract from Uncle Bob's book Clean Agile. Although he has fallen out of grace with the champions of social justice, the sentiment…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.