Andrey (azangru) wrote,

Heard that pangolins are now off the hook from being considered a link in the chain of events that resulted in the covid-19 outbreak.

I googled for the confirmation, and found a peculiar article, to be published in the October issue of some journal. It's a letter to the editor, which ends in a clearly ideological message:

We must reconsider the way we interact with Nature. Pangolins, bats and other animals are not responsible for the epidemics or pandemics affecting humans. Blaming wildlife for zoonotic emergence may result in useless and highly damaging culling, mass slaughter and loss of biodiversity.

"...and other animals are not responsible for the epidemics or pandemics affecting humans"? Are they arguing against the whole zoonotic model of transmission or origin of infectious diseases in general? I'm not sure. I'm not sure how this conclusion follows from the main part of their article.

  • (no subject)

    This was a good talk. Interesting to see that SvelteKit is taking the same direction as, by using html forms to submit data without the…

  • (no subject)

    A talk about building large-scale (React) apps. These days, the questions that concern me are: - how can a project be scaled up without…

  • (no subject)

    Watched the second episode of The Problem with Jon Stewart. I thought of Jon as an intellectual comedian. Someone who transcends the limitations of…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment