Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

A Twitter feed that helped me better understand the terms.

When I hear the phrase "nonviolent protest", I usually picture a handful of people with signs standing on a sidewalk. Truly peaceful.

When a group of people starts making a nuisance of themselves, such as blocking traffic, gluing themselves to trains, or even spray-painting graffiti over walls, I start having a cognitive dissonance, because this is not how the concept works in my head.

But, according to this twitter thread, when they say "nonviolent protest", what they mean, first and foremost, is making a nuisance of themselves and disrupting the normal flow of daily life:





It’s especially interesting, because I've heard different politicians over the last week say: "We want you to protest (but do so peacefully)". Do they, really? Do they speak the same language as the protesters?
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    On the prevailing ideology in the industry, continued. Heydon is a designer. And a web developer. He is a fairly recognizable figure in the frontend…

  • (no subject)

    Airborne — as opposed to what? Was any other hypothesis of its transmission ever seriously considered (apart from the strange countries, such as…

  • (no subject)

    Crap! Why is it that almost anything that smacks of nice dev experience turns out to be an antipattern? I thought we were being pretty clever for…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 8 comments