Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

It appears that Bret Weinstein thinks that coronaviruses are retroviruses. Here in his podcast he says, "One reason... is that it [SARS-CoV-2] is a retrovirus". He then proceeds to briefly describe retroviruses by saying — correctly — that retroviruses reverse transcribe their RNA into DNA and can then integrate this DNA into the host cell genome.

The problem with that is that coronaviruses are definitely not retroviruses. Here, for example, is an article describing lifecycle of a coronavirus; at at no point in it is reverse transcription involved. That a professor of biology, such as Weinstein, would make such a mistake is a huge red flag.

Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    (retweeted by a developer) How does she interpret what she has highlighted — "unlawful blocking of a public street" — as "pedestrians whose…

  • (no subject)

    Google has finally become ready to promote its Lit ecosystem properly. I thought they were going make their announcements at the coming Google IO;…

  • (no subject)

    Is it ... Bill Maher? Is he, in the penetrating eyes of this insightful lady, the emblem of white supremacy now? The comments to the tweet say it…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments