Andrey (azangru) wrote,

A year-old article from The Spectator denying, or, shall we say, cocking an eyebrow at the suggestion of human-made global warming.

It’s not the actual claims of the article that got me interested (denying human-induced climate change is a receding faith, probably soon to join antivaxxers, and then, eventually, flat-earthers), but the way the article is written. I tried to find more about this Andrew Urban from Australia, but couldn't. I got curious what his background was. Humanities, most likely? Judging by what he uses to build his argument — a catalogue of general-purpose utterances by people related (or unrelated) to science; your basic namedropping (Einstein said, Hawking said, Mark Twain said...). There is something from literary studies, or literary criticism about this method. After finishing the article, the reader is none the wiser about what exactly is wrong with climate science.


  • (no subject)

    A conversation with Justin Fagnani about what's coming for LitHTML and LitElement. New directives seem reasonable. "Controllers" for reusable chunks…

  • (no subject)

    I have only recently become aware of the audience engagement techniques that twitch streamers are using. They would create automatic overlays that…

  • (no subject)

    From an article on Lenin's medical history: Of the three [Lenin's siblings] who survived past young adulthood, a sister died of a stroke at age 71,…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.