Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

Professional British offence-takers have been loudly indignant about Jacob Rees-Mogg this week, who, while discussing the fire in Grenfell Tower (probably because the results of the first phase of the inquiry had come out a day or so before) said something to the effect of had he been in that tower during the fire, he would have disregarded the advice of the fire brigade to stay put and tried to get out of the building anyway. "I think if either of us were in a fire, whatever the fire brigade said, we would leave the burning building. It just seems a common sense thing to do." (link)

This may be stupid on various levels: because of the 20-20 hindsight, and because how would you know how you would react in a burning building. But what offended the professionally aggrieved, e.g. the Guardian, is that they understood his words as being a jibe at the stupidity of those who had died in the fire. Which they clearly weren’t.

And this cud gets chewed over and over again by the BBC for several days already!
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    A beautiful cartoon on the front page of The Week:

  • (no subject)

    This is just as bad as a brief exchange with a belligerent guest on a regular news show: Six minutes! Six minutes, during which Rand Paul is…

  • (no subject)

    The war on repetitions:

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments