Andrey (azangru) wrote,

The media have an infuriating habit when it comes to leaked documents. They publish only small excerpts from them.

Such was the case with Kim Darroch’s (British ambassador to the US) emails, from which the media reported only several phrases: inept, insecure, incompetent ("footless, yellow earth-worm," said Bagheera). Such is now the case with an allegedly leaked style guide that Jacob Rees Mogg sent to his staff. It is a bloody style guide, for goodness sake; publish it in whole if you have it, so that your readers can see its prescriptions in context. But the extracts from it that they publish are hard to make heads or tails of — are they exact extracts from the source document, or are they journalists’ compilation of what they read?

This filter between source material and the reader, that is the reporter, and indeed the paper itself, is very annoying. And then other media start amplifying the message based on the scraps published by the first media.

  • (no subject)

    Tweeted and retweeted by developers. Dunno. Been working for me. Can't speak to excellence, but certainly lots of stimulating humiliation:

  • (C)opied from Twitter

    Don't know if this is real or not, but if it is, it's really strange that Canadian bureaucrats should be specifically instructed not to use the…

  • (no subject)

    This was a good talk. Interesting to see that SvelteKit is taking the same direction as, by using html forms to submit data without the…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.