Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

Saw this in a dev’s feed:



which is a response to:



Now, I am not a particular fan of Eric («та еще истеричка» was someone’s opinion of him; and one of his main mantras, composition over inheritance, turned out to be terminologically flawed), but his list, however arbitrary and selective, is:
- specific for javascript
- testable in an interview situation.

The touchy-feely response, in contrast, is not specific to a language and is not testable. Apart from the first item, which is the only technical one and thus even more haphazard than Elliott’s four (why only testing and deployment, why not development best practices?).
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Thought of this phrase today for some reason, then thought whether it exists in English (putting toothpaste back into the tube came to mind), then…

  • (no subject)

    I think many (perhaps most) people are totally fine with being a free-rider, a bludger, or a sponge (remember Trump who said that he pays little…

  • (no subject)

    Someone who self-identifies as a technical writer, among other things, begins her article How To Build An E-Commerce Site With Angular 11, Commerce…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments