Andrey (azangru) wrote,

The word talented is so often used simply as a general nicety, likely not meaning what it was supposed to mean (i.e. "gifted").

Exhibit A:

"Talent" shouldn't depend on whether you figure out how to help someone; "talent" is a pre-condition. "Talented", moreover intensified by "incredibly", seems a very odd successor to "teachable" (someone is teachable; you taught them to do the job; and now they are incredibly talented? what a load of bullshit).

Exhibit B:

Again, if read literally, the sentence seems to be saying that there are people who have a talent for being technical reviewers. A rather odd talent, that.

I don’t think I’ve seen any dictionary describe the word talented as a vague term of approbation — the sense in which it seems to be used.

  • (no subject)

    Which/whose corporate interests is he talking about? Which corporations are interested in what? I am so confused.

  • (no subject)

    Two appearances of Noam Chomsky, in which he goes hard on the unvaccinated. Take, traffic rules, he says. Suppose, he says, I don't want to…

  • (no subject)

    Joe Rogan's episode with Michael Shellenberger is very good.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.