Andrey (azangru) wrote,

RT proudly ran a small article on how Suzanne Spaulding (haven't heard) said at a CSIS (also haven't heard) forum that RT was using truth against the US.

There are two points I'd like to make. One, textual. When the expletive will news companies start to use proper references to their source material? It's not just RT. Most news media that I have seen also do that — or, rather, they don't. In this particular case, the source was easy enough to find; it's this discussion, and Spaulding says the quoted words at about 1 hour 23 minutes:

but gee, if you news people just put links in your shitty articles, it would make it so much easier for the readers to appreciate the wider context. Bloggers or the twitterati do it so much better than you. Shameful, really.

Another point, personal. I am failing to see what's so terribly wrong with what they keep accusing RT of. She is saying, RT is very one-sided in reporting only negative facts (of, let's say, the American justice system). Well, if other media don't report them, doesn't it make them sort of one-sided too? Won't the combination of the two produce stereoscopic vision?

  • (no subject)

    (retweeted by a developer) How does she interpret what she has highlighted — "unlawful blocking of a public street" — as "pedestrians whose…

  • (no subject)

    Google has finally become ready to promote its Lit ecosystem properly. I thought they were going make their announcements at the coming Google IO;…

  • (no subject)

    Is it ... Bill Maher? Is he, in the penetrating eyes of this insightful lady, the emblem of white supremacy now? The comments to the tweet say it…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.