Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru



"demonstrated exactly how intervention, rule-breaking, and destruction happen"? huh?

I didn't look up the explanation in New Yorker itself (because of paywall), but here‘s the next best thing I could find: https://uk.remonews.com/world-cup-2018-the-moral-clarity-of-pussy-riots-protest Which looks half-baked and unproofread (I would guess they have corrected at least some mistakes on New Yorker’s site). Apparently the extended version of the interpretation reads as follows:

"But the terrestrial policeman, who intervenes every day in the game and knows no rules, is destroying our world."
The four women, taking to the field, have shown exactly how this happens: the beautiful world of sport has its bubble punctured by people who run and agitate haphazardly, intent on destruction.


"exactly". A confused run in front of a frenzied crowd is, of course, an "exact demonstration".
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Also, Google's documentation style guide. With the latest trends about the correct language, obvi. This one via HN.

  • (no subject)

    Google's document on how they build Chrome dev tools with web components. And yeah, it includes a special dance for some semblance of type safety,…

  • (no subject)

    On the ideology in the industry: A guest on a podcast: There was a thread on Twitter the other day, with Adam Rackis, and he had made a comment…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments