Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

So Munk debate on political correctness happened:



As Stephen Fry said by the end of the debate, it didn't really go very well: the participants quickly got sidetracked into discussing politics, instead of language-related policies, and there also were some bouts of pointless bickering. The format of the debate, with four people given turns to speak in a sort of criss-cross manner, with the moderator trying to ensure each of the participants gets equal time to speak, is not very conducive to a logically coherent discussion. And yet I think Jordan Peterson gave a powerful opening statement, at least the one very close to my feelings on the subjects that he touched, and to me that was the best — the most intellectually stimulating — part of the debate. Perhaps had it been the debate just between him and Michael Dyson, it would have been more interesting in the sense that each would address more points raised by the other (although I am not too sure about that: while Peterson is earnest, Dyson is prone to facetiousness).
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    The two guys sitting across the table opposite to each other are two Ukrainian brothers who arrived in the US as teenagers: Twin brothers Artur and…

  • (no subject)

    Course description: In today's business world there are massive goals around diversity and inclusion and you are empowered to lead the way as…

  • Via Reddit

    I didn't know what the operation game was, so I looked it up. The guy, indeed, is clearly awake: I only learnt about charlie horse from King's…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments