Andrey (azangru) wrote,

The post-truth era (if it really existed and wasn't just a catch phrase popular among the left) could help very nicely in the story with the blocking of Telegram in Russia. In such a world, the regulatory agency would perfunctorily block some means of accessing Telegram, while the users would play along and pretend they can't use it anymore. Both sides would then be happy: the regulatory agency would behave as if its job were done, and the users would quietly keep using the messenger.

But in fact it doesn't work like that. Users openly laugh at the efforts of the regulatory agency, and list the ways of accessing the messenger. The founder of the messenger declares that he will always provide a means of using it. And the regulatory agency, in response to all that, is trying more and more damaging measures to block the access.

(I probably should care about the fate of Telegram, given that it can be followed by services that I actually use, but I don't.)

  • (no subject)

    A pager on the site of the Smashing Magazine: What happens when you press on the button with an ellipsis? Nothing does. Why, then, does it look…

  • (no subject)

    Glimpsed an interesting text on Facebook. Is opens a window into a consciousness that is reflecting both on the history of the Internet and on its…

  • (no subject)

    They are both developer advocates. And they both talk about the Chrome 90 release. But they have different linguistic proficiency. Compare and…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.