Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

Yet another one of the numerous repetitions of the same cui bono argument:



The reasoning is totally backwards. The argument, as applied, goes like this: X had no apparent reason to do this; therefore, X didn't do it. While a much more convincing argument would look like this: Has X done it? If yes, then reasons aren't really important (but figuring them out may be of some interest for the curious). If not, then reasons (or the lack thereof) have no relevance whatsoever.
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Results of a survey. No idea who those guys are or how reliable their data, but I've been wondering for a while now what people mean when they say…

  • (no subject)

    I'm listening to The Ickabog, by J.K. Rowling and read, with much gusto, by Stephen Fry. What started like a nice children's tale not dissimilar from…

  • (no subject)

    From today's questions to the Prime Minister: Mr Speaker, today, millions of Uyghur people in China live in fear under a cruel regime. The BBC,…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments