Andrey (azangru) wrote,
Andrey
azangru

Yet another one of the numerous repetitions of the same cui bono argument:



The reasoning is totally backwards. The argument, as applied, goes like this: X had no apparent reason to do this; therefore, X didn't do it. While a much more convincing argument would look like this: Has X done it? If yes, then reasons aren't really important (but figuring them out may be of some interest for the curious). If not, then reasons (or the lack thereof) have no relevance whatsoever.
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    In the novel Hamnet (or Hamnet and Judith, as I believe is its title in the UK), the author outlines a fictionalized story of What the boy…

  • (no subject)

    Whoa! The project in question is Rome. The Jamie is this Jamie.

  • (no subject)

    Is Twitter... copying Clubhouse? Not that I expected that I would be able to join — they will probably at a minimum require a Twitter account in…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments