Andrey (azangru) wrote,

Here’s Bryan Lunduke talking about political (or, I don't know, social? ideological?) squabbles in the open-source world:

His monologues in front of the camera are a bit tedious to watch (it's definitely a common problem with the genre, when the absence of a real audience or of a conversation partner leads to slowing of the speech and to repetitions), and he also is using the words racism and sexism as a reasonable layman would, i.e. naively (people familiar with feminist discourse would be aware of their appropriation of these terms in such a manner that one can't be said to be racist against whites, or sexist against men); but still, if only as a list of anecdotes, it's not bad.

Updated after watching the rest of the video: ok, I take it back, there are only three anecdotes in that list; the rest is just repetition - I guess to get to the target duration of the episode. So yeah, it's mostly bad. Bryan is just being Bryan.

  • (no subject)

    Also, Google's documentation style guide. With the latest trends about the correct language, obvi. This one via HN.

  • (no subject)

    Google's document on how they build Chrome dev tools with web components. And yeah, it includes a special dance for some semblance of type safety,…

  • (no subject)

    On the ideology in the industry: A guest on a podcast: There was a thread on Twitter the other day, with Adam Rackis, and he had made a comment…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.